|
Society for Philosophy in the Contemporary
World
Philosophy in the
Contemporary World
Abstracts: Volume 1
(1994) through Volume 5 (1998)
Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 1994
Time and Space in African (Igbo) Thought
Egbeke Aja
Abstract:This paper is an attempt to articulate an
African (Igbo) conception of space and time. Igbo terms and
phrases are explained in light of their traditional,
non-European cultural and linguistic background. Care is taken
to present a distinctively African account, not a neo-colonial
one. The African conceptions of space and time account for some
African beliefs and practices regarding causality, including
such widely misunderstood phenomena as divination, the "medicine
man," and "magic."
Paradise Well Lost: Communitarian
Nostalgia and the Lonely Logic of the Liberal Self
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract:"Paradise Well Lost" offers a description and
criticism of communitarian claims that in contemporary liberal
society the self is in sad shape, that liberal society is out of
harmony with the needs of the self, and that such a society
makes the good life nearly impossible to achieve. It is argued
that communitarian thought is driven by a false and deluded
nostalgia for a self-world unity that never was and never can
be, that human consciousness prohibits the neatly unified
communialization of self and world that seems desired by much
communitarian thinking. A final argument claims that there are
nontrivial connections between the communitarian desire for
self-world unity, and the twentieth-century emergence of
totalitarian society--connections about which it is wise to be
worried.
Right
Intention and the Oil Factor in the Second Gulf War
Kenneth W. Kemp
Abstract:This essay responds to the
argument that US interest in Kuwaiti oil made its war against
Iraq fail the just-war criterion of right intention. That
argument is based on a misunderstanding of the criterion,
namely, that right intention requires not merely the presence of
a concern for justice but the absence of any other (especially
self-interested) motives. Correction of this misunderstanding is
important to application of the just-war theory to the general
question of intervention in foreign wars.
Moral
Fanaticism and the Holocaust: A Defense of Kant Against Silber
Lee F. Kerckhove
Abstract: I defend Kant's moral psychology against John
R. Silber's argument that Kant cannot account for the radical
evil of Hitler. Silber's argument cannot be maintained, I argue,
if Kant's account of theological and moral fanaticism, and the
personality of the moral fanatic, are taken into account. I
contend that Kant's writings support an analogy between the
fanatical pursuit of religious and moral ideals and Hitler's
fanatical pursuit of an ideal of racial purity. I conclude that
Kant's account of moral fanaticism is adequate to account for
the actions and moral psychology of Hitler.
Identity, Social Relations, and Time: The Implications of Mead
for Democratic Social Theory.
Ric Caric Northrup
Abstract: This essay analyzes the nature of social
relations when individual identity is conceived as both
autonomous and socially constructed. Viewing identity as
autonomous and socially constructed makes it necessary both to
conceive individuals as socially related to others in the
present and past, and to incorporate individuals into multiple
systems of social relations. I argue that George Herbert Mead's
theory of social systems provides a basis for performing these
tasks. By adding a concept of "contemporaneous consciousness" to
Mead's notion of temporal systems, it is possible to view
individuals as autonomous within a multiplicity of temporal
systems.
Death
and Pictures in Wittgenstein's 'Tractatus'
Saranindranath Tagore
Abstract: The Picture Theory based on a realist ontology
is central to the argument of the Tractatus.
Wittgenstein, however, makes idealist claims while discussing
the notion of the metaphysical subject. In this paper, I develop
an interpretation of this text in which realism and idealism are
reconciled. The task is accomplished by focusing on the later
remarks of the Tractatus in general and the remarks on
death in particular.
Constitution and By-Laws
Society for Philosophy in the Contemporary World
No Abstract
Volume 1, Number 2, Summer 1994
MacIntyre's Conservatism and Its Cure: The Formal Structure of
Traditions.
Matthew Freytag
Abstract: Conservative communitarian Alasdair MacIntyre
makes a fundamental claim about the formal conditions for
rationality, personhood, and intelligible valuation, and a
detachable, less fundamental empirical claim that these formal
conditions can be met only in a hierarchically organized social
tradition. Having suggested a formal account of narrative
tradition which relies on the schematic notion of systematic
complexity, MacIntyre retreats to an account in terms of canon
and authority. He thus obscures the structures that underlie his
own metaphysics of morals, the structures of the practices,
narrative unities, and traditions which on his account are both
identity-constituting and value-creating. Once these structures
are discerned, the possibility of good lives will no longer seem
linked to preservation of the forms of the existing polis.
Multiculturalism and Welfare Reform
John D. Jones
Abstract: Multiculturalism has not yet systematically
addressed, much less challenged, dominant approaches to poverty
and welfare reform. This lacuna must be rectified since the
widespread poverty experienced by people of color poses a
substantive threat to the development of a truly inclusive and
multicultural society. Present approaches to poverty, defined in
the context of welfare reform, are defective for three reasons:
First, welfare reform basically aims to reduce welfare
"dependency" by moving so-called able-bodied welfare recipients
off welfare and into the labor market. This project seems
destined to fail given a chronic scarcity of jobs, and
especially decent-paying jobs. Second, welfare reform does not
provide an adequate framework for the general alleviation of
poverty since many poor receive little or no welfare assistance.
Third, welfare assistance is based on an invidious, stigmatizing
distinction between the able-bodied poor (viewed as unworthy and
disreputable) and the disabled poor. Thus, given
disproportionate rates of poverty among people of color as well
as a general (but mistaken) impression that US poverty is
principally a "minority" problem, present policies and attitudes
toward the poor insure that many people of color will bear the
brunt of economic and symbolic marginalization despite gains
which accrue to some people of color as the result of greater
racial and cultural inclusiveness.
Health
Maintenance as Responsibility for Self.
Raymond Kolcaba & Katharine Kolcaba
Abstract: Many kinds of health compromising norms,
habits, and beliefs are highly resistant to change thereby
preventing new knowledge about health maintenance from advancing
widespread better health. Persons would be more responsive if
they used a health ethic to harmonize personal behavior with
health-maintaining practices. We argue that common sense
morality includes a portion of a health ethic in the guise of
responsibilities to maintain health as well as avoid self
destruction. We discuss an example in which its application can
retard decline in older age that results from a sedentary
lifestyle.
Philosophy of Liberation in the North American Context:
Transforming Oppressor Consciousness.
Kate Lindemann
Abstract: This paper utilizes concepts form the works of
Paulo Freire and other Latin American philosophers of liberation
to formulate a philosophy of liberation in a North American
context. Since many North Americans experience a double
consciousness, that is, both oppressor and oppressed
consciousness, our liberating task is quite complex. This study
offers both a philosophical framework and an example of the
process of demythologizing one aspect of North American
consciousness, the consciousness of privilege.
The Methodological Isolation of Religious
Belief.
Edward L. Schoen
Abstract: According to Langdon Gilkey, both religion and
science are cognitive enterprises, but they are separated
methodologically. As a result, science and religion are
concerned with different, though related levels of truth.
Against these claims, historical examples are used to argue that
scientific and religious explanations cannot be so neatly
separated. To the contrary, both fields frequently treat
overlapping ranges of data in methodologically opportunistic
ways.
The Sociopolitical Implications of
Multiculturalism.
Jorge M. Valadez
Abstract: In this essay, I propose a definition of
multiculturalism and provide pragmatic and theoretical reasons
for accepting the multicultural perspective when it is defined
in this manner. In addition, I discuss and defend three
sociopolitical principles to which we are committed in adopting
the multicultural perspective and discuss some of the concrete
social and institutional changes needed for implementing these
principles.
Volume 1, Number 3, Fall 1994
Democratic Public Judgment: The Role of
"Mutual Comprehension".
Michael K. Briand
Abstract: The need to choose between good things in
conflict lies at the heart of politics. Only citizens
deliberating together can authoritatively form the democratic
public judgment necessary to resolve such conflicts. The key
step to arriving at a sound widely supported public judgment is
getting all members of the public to "comprehend"--to understand
and appreciate--the goods in conflict. Mutual comprehension
enables us to combine our individual perspectives without loss,
thereby providing the basis for collective deliberation. Such
comprehension is essential because the mutual respect between
citizens upon which democratic politics depends is impossible
without it. Mutual comprehension is possible because we share a
common human nature that, despite our manifest and irreducible
differences is built around a limited and universal set of human
needs and dispositions.
Transforming Stories: The Death of Ivan
Ilyich, The Birth of A Reflective Life.
Jeremiah Conway
Abstract: The problem addressed by this paper concerns
the responsibility of higher education in the growing
thoughtlessness of culture. By "thoughtlessness" is meant not
the absence of mental "busyness," but indifference to the
self-reflective life. How do we cope with the fact that, for so
many, the educative act has little or nothing to do with the
cultivation of self-reflection, especially when this
indifference is amply represented within higher education as
well as the wider culture? The paper unfolds in three sections.
First, it explores the factors complicating the search for
effective materials by which to instigate and encourage the
transformation to a self-reflective life. Second, it argues that
stories, particularly what it calls "transforming stories," play
an important role in provoking and providing insight into the
"turning around of the soul" from unreflective to reflective
living. Finally, it illustrates how one such transforming story,
The Death of Ivan Ilyich, by Leo Tolstoy, helps
accomplish this educational goal.
Pluralism, Integrity, and the Interpretive
Model of Law
Deirdre Golash
Abstract: In Law's Empire, Ronald Dworkin argues
that the choice between conflicting interpretations of law is,
and should be, influenced by the aspiration to "integrity," that
is, the construction of law as a coherent whole, as though it
were the product of a single author. I argue that, particularly
under conditions where opinion on relevant issues is
significantly divided, the search for a single coherent
explanation of law may be seriously misleading. The idea of
integrity is a principled basis for legal interpretation only
where there is an underlying unity, rather than an underlying
plurality. Dworkin suggests that there is a basis for striving
toward such unity, and for an obligation to obey the law, in our
"associative" obligations to fellow members of our political
community. I argue that such obligations, to the extent that
they exist, are too weak to provide an adequate basis for a
moral obligation to obey the law.
Healing the Ills of Unemployment, Societal
Breakdown, and Ecological Degradation: Gandhi's Vision for a
Sustainable Way of Life.
Bart Gruzalski
Abstract: In this paper I describe Gandhi's vision for a
way of life that would be an essential part of any sustainable
solution to world wide problems of unemployment, societal
breakdown and ecological degradation. Gandhi's vision included a
communitarian lifestyle of simplicity and non-accumulation in
which agriculture would be supported by cottage industries using
appropriate technologies (e.g., spinning). Assuming obligations
to future generations, Gandhi's proposal highlights the degree
to which our First-World lifestyle is morally impermissible. One
objection to this criticism of our First-World lifestyles is
that we can solve the problem of ecological degradation by
exporting only appropriate technologies to the Third World and
supplementing our use of consumptive technologies with
technological cleanups. This suggestion is not only
irresponsible and unjust, but also hopeless, for our resource
consumptive standards are already the model for development
worldwide. To counteract this destructive model we must begin to
recreate, in the First World, sustainable lifestyles that others
will want to emulate. Part of this task involves the inner work
that has been a casualty of the ideologies of modernity, and
Gandhi's vision is a blueprint for both the outer and inner work
that are essential to recreate a sustainable society.
Feminism and Vegetarianism: A Critique of
Peter Singer.
Erin McKenna
Abstract: Singer's ethics assume an autonomous,
impartial, abstract reasoner. Nonhuman animals, like human
animals, have an interest in not suffering; so we all agree on
an impartial, rational, consistent minimum standard of treatment
that we see must extend to nonhuman animals. While I think this
kind of argument works well in the "liberal" context of
countries based on social contract reasoning, I am not convinced
it goes far enough in achieving the desired attitude shift. We
are still encouraged to think in terms of the self-interest of
an autonomous, impartial, abstract reasoner, and thus there are
many instances in which it is perfectly "reasonable" to harm
nonhuman animals.
To challenge Singer I use views of the
individual proposed by socialist feminist and radical feminist
theories. Both of these theories (in all their variety) propose
a substantial revisioning of the individual and thereby shift
the focus from rights talk to issues of responsibility and care.
While there are clear dangers in these approaches as well, I
believe there is a fruitful combination of Singer's argument
with these feminist approaches that will help us see the deep
nature of our connectedness to nonhuman animals and make us
realize that the eating of meat is really a form of cannibalism.
Feminism and Vegetarianism: A Response
Peter Singer
Abstract: Erin McKenna is correct to question the
relative weight that I give to emotions and reason in Animal
Liberation. In 1975 when the first edition was published,
emotion played a key role in the campaigns of animal societies,
and I wished to make an appeal to reason that would have ethical
and political impact. I disagree with McKenna's conclusion that
an impartial, objective stance is either impossible or
undesirable. I argue that we should not abandon the attempt to
reach an impartial position. Admittedly, in some disputes,
giving equal weight to all interests will be extraordinarily
difficult. But to do so is not impossible, just extraordinarily
difficult, and a decision must be make regarding which course is
better on the whole. This difficulty gives no reason to abandon
impartiality.
Can Justice as Fairness Accommodate
Diversity? An Examination of the Representation of Minorities
and Women in A Theory of Justice.
Lara M. Trout
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to expose a
problem of application in John Rawls' theory of justice. An
examination of his treatment of the application of his
principles in A Theory of Justice reveals an
insensitivity toward the proper representation of minorities and
women. This problem, which is rooted in Rawls' conception of the
relevant social position is not properly addressed by him, yet
is grounded in inconsistencies which undermine the just
practical implementation of his theory. A provisional solution
to this problem is to provide the original position with
historical information, as well as to place within its
jurisdiction the application of the two principles of justice.
Volume 1, Number 4, Winter 1994
Is Deep Ecology Too Radical?
William Aiken
Abstract: The theory of Deep Ecology is characterized as
having two essential features: the belief that nature is
inherently valuable, and the belief that one's self is truly
realized by identification with nature. Four common but
different meanings of the term "radical" are presented. Whether
the theory of Deep Ecology is "too radical" depends upon which
of these meanings one is using.
A Surprising Rediscovery and Partial
Review of The Foundations of Belief by James Balfour.
Wallace Gray
Abstract: Well known as the British politician
responsible for the Balfour Declaration during World War I,
James Balfour was also a philosopher. Long forgotten, his
remarkable book The Foundations of Belief (1985) merits
contemporary reassessment. Critical of modern
compartmentalization, Balfour argues for an integration of
religion, philosophy, and science--a position now often
identified as postmodern. This article presents some of
Balfour's contemporary scholarly significance, and hints at his
usefulness in undergraduate teaching.
Moral Growth in Children's Literature: A
Primer with Examples.
Joe Frank Jones, III
Abstract: This essay applies a plausible model for moral
growth to examples of secular and religious children's
literature. The point is that moral maturation, given this
model, requires imaginary worlds on both secular and religious
presuppositions. Trying to guide a child's reading toward either
religious or secular books rather than toward good literature is
shown therefore to miss the mark of good parenting.
Speaking for Myself in Philosophy.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract: The conventions of positivism, still the
standard model for academic discourse, require philosophers to
take knowledge out of the context of personal experience. In
this essay, I argue that such a decontextualization impoverished
the development of moral and epistemological knowledge. I
propose to contextualize such knowledge by using the personal
essay as a style of philosophical writing. As literary style
shapes what can be thought and said, adoption of a different
literary style calls for a reinterpretation of philosophy's
understanding of the self, the quest for truth. and the nature
of universality.
Five Arguments for Vegetarianism.
William O. Stephens
Abstract: Five different arguments for vegetarianism are
discussed: the system of meat production deprives poor people of
food to provide meat for the wealthy. thus violating the
principle of distributive justice; the world livestock industry
causes great and manifold ecological destruction; meat-eating
cultures and societal oppression of women are intimately linked
and so feminism and vegetarianism must both be embraced to
transform our patriarchal culture; both utilitarian and
rights-based reasoning lead to the conclusion that raising and
slaughtering animals is immoral, and so we ought to boycott
meat; meat consumption causes many serious diseases and lowers
life expectancy, and so is unhealthy. Objections to each
argument are examined. The conclusion reached is that the
cumulative case successfully establishes vegetarianism as a
virtuous goal.
Feminist Revaluation of the Mythical
Triad, Lilith, Adam, Eve: A Contribution to Role Model Theory.
Henny Wenkart
Abstract: This essay inquires into the need for and power
of role models, and suggests some answers. The example it
employs to study the issue is the contemporary Jewish feminist
"role model," Lilith, first wife of Adam. Various and opposite
forms of the Lilith-and-Adam myth through the ages are given,
including new contributions from a Lilith anthology in
preparation by the author and others. Those needs of women and
men that the mythical "role model" is constructed to satisfy are
suggested.
Volume 2, Number 1, Spring 1995
Rorty, Ironist Theory, and Socio-Political
Control.
Dane Depp
Abstract: In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity,
Richard Rorty courageously takes a stand against the public
dissemination of ironist philosophical theory, such as that
produced by Nietzsche, because he sees it as being socially
undermining and irreconcilable in theoretical terms with liberal
democratic values. And yet, the intellectuals in his ideal
society would, privately, share many of the same views from
which Rorty would desire that the general public be protected.
Thus Rorty would appear to trade tensions between the individual
and the state for tensions between the intellectual and the
nonintellectual--a dubious improvement. By redescribing both the
motives of the typical ironist theorist and his basic view of
large-scale, socio-political structure I will try to reinstate
the social value of ironist theory. Throughout the paper I will
formulate perspectives and raise questions illustrative of such
theory and aimed at trying to maintain as full and open a
communication as possible between the individual, whether
intellectual or not, and socio-political structures within which
he finds himself.
Crisis and Narrativity
Ron Hirschbein
Abstract: Despite the dramatic changes in international
politics it appears that crises--episodes in which
decision-makers hazard urgent, perilous choices--will remain a
prominent and dangerous feature of international relations. This
realization prompts the question that informs this paper: why do
American decision-makers define a situation as a crisis in the
first place? I argue that prevailing theories do not adequately
account for crises: the same situation (or perception of the
situation) may be interpreted differently by various
decision-makers. Specifically, it may be construed as an
endurable problem to be resolved in due course, or an
unendurable crisis demanding immediate resolution at
considerable risk. I entertain the possibility that crises occur
because crisis discourse has become the lingua franca in
the halls of power. Taking a semiotic approach, I argue that
crisis narratives are read into ambiguous situations to render
them meaningful and dramatically self-valorizing.
Cultural Diversity and the Systems View.
Debora Hammond
Abstract: While systems concepts had a tremendous impact
on social thought in the 1950s and 1960s, they are increasingly
under attack in the current postmodern climate with its emphasis
on particularity and difference. The idea of the system is
associated with technocracy, hierarchical forms of social
organization, and the suppression of individual difference.
However, there is a significant body of work within the systems
tradition that fosters an appreciation of diversity through its
ecological orientation, and supports more participatory forms of
social organization based on its understanding of the
self-organizing nature of living systems. While the issue of
cultural diversity is often addressed in oppositional terms, I
suggest that it might be more effectively served through an
appreciation of the global interdependence between all peoples
and between humans and nature that can only be sustained on a
cooperative and participatory basis.
Emancipatory Social Science and Genealogy:
Habermas on Nietzsche.
Lee Kerckhove
Abstract: I argue that Habermas' critique of Nietzsche
overlooks the similarities between his conception of an
emancipatory social science and Nietzsche's conception of
genealogy. I conclude that it is necessary to disagree with
Habermas' contention that with Nietzsche the critique of
modernity abandons its emancipatory content.
No Goddess Was Your Mother: Western
Philosophy's Abandonment of Its Multicultural Matrix.
Steven Schroeder
Abstract: This paper begins with three observations: 1)
At what is generally believed to be its origin in ancient
Greece, "Western" philosophy is not sharply distinguished from
poetry, science, or theology; 2) At what is generally believed
to be its origin, "Western" philosophy is not Western; it is
born in a multicultural matrix consisting of African, Asian,
Middle Eastern, and Southern European influences; 3) As
philosophy comes to think of itself as "Western," it separates
itself from poetry, science, and the rest of the
world--particularly from its roots in Northern Africa.
In the first three sections, I examine
each observation in turn. In the fourth section, I take up the
implications of "Western" philosophy's alienation from its roots
for the contemporary controversy surrounding multiculturalism.
If the roots of "Western" philosophy are multicultural, I
propose a "radical" philosophy that reclaims them in our own
multicultural context. More specifically, I propose to ask a
question posed here in its most brutal (but also most honest)
form: does "Western" philosophy depend on the abandonment of its
friends and the murder of the indigenous peoples it encounters?
If yes, then it is necessary to ask whether (in Virgil's terms)
"piety" demands that the West march on in any case. Colonialism
and neo-colonialism join Aeneas in answering both questions
affirmatively. If no, then it is possible to proceed with the
kind of radical reclamation suggested above.
Volume 2, Number 2, Summer 1995
Thoreauvian Patriotism as an Environmental
Virtue
Philip Cafaro
Abstract: In Walden Henry David Thoreau argues for
and against patriotism. This paper argues that thoughtful
environmentalists should do likewise. It explicates Thoreau's
accounts of "settling" and farming as efforts to rethink and
deepen his connections to the land. These efforts define a
patriotism that is local, thoughtful and moral. Thoreau's
economic philosophy can be seen as applied patriotism. Like
other virtues such as courage or prudence, patriotism is liable
to a skewed development and various kinds of misuse. Yet
properly developed it is a part of a good human life.
Thoreauvian patriotism provides a strong base from which to
oppose militarism and xenophobia, which many intellectuals
mistakenly equate with patriotism.
Ted Schoen on "The Methodological
Isolation of Religious Belief."
Frederick Ferre
Abstract: In this brief comment on Ted Schoen's paper, I
tend to agree more than I disagree. Methodological isolation has
been widely and uncritically accepted by thinkers about religion
and science, and Schoen's dissipation of the isolationist
discourse deserves positive notice. For too long, science has
been the bully of the epistemic neighborhood, and religious
thinkers have taken refuge in methodological isolation. As
Schoen argues, neither religion nor science is isolated; rather,
both are interacting in the same comprehensive and value-laden
domain, which also includes art, poetry, ethics and metaphysics.
A Big Bang Cosmological Argument?
Dennis Temple
Abstract: William Lane Craig has defended a modern First
Cause argument based on 1) a principle of universal causality
and 2) the claim that the universe must have had a beginning.
But 1) is susceptible to counter examples from quantum theory.
Moreover, Craig's defense of 2) is open to serious question. He
claims that an actual infinity (of time) is impossible; he also
claims that 2) is in fact supported by big bang theory. I argue
that both of these claims are mistaken, and that in consequence
we have no particular reason to suppose that 2) is true. I
conclude that the First Cause argument fails, but I suggest that
a weaker inductive argument might be worth a try.
Kant and the Land Ethic
Jennifer Welchman
Abstract: Does Leopold's land ethic principle represent a
break with traditional Western moral philosophies as some have
argued? Or is it instead an extension of traditional Western
moral ideas as Leopold believed? I argue that Leopold's
principle is compatible with an ecologically-informed
Kantianism.
Philosophical Counselling: Bridging the
Narrative Rift
K. A. Zoe
Abstract: Self-understanding is to a great extent defined
by narrative: who we are as human beings is determined by the
stories we, and others, tell about ourselves. Yet many are
unable to compose coherent personal narratives, as their
experiences do not fall within the scope of an accepted
conceptual framework. Survivors of trauma are particularly apt
to fall into this "narrative rift, " where there can be no words
to describe, and hence can be no assimilation of, their
experiences. Using the example of child sexual abuse, and
drawing on the work of Bass, Spence, Schafer, and Guignon, I
propose an examination of the nature of narrative fragmentation
itself. Philosophical counselling may succeed where
psychoanalysis might not: for where the latter has theoretical
commitments to specific narratives, the former, through its
reluctance to force epistemological or metaphysical assumptions
on the narrator, may well facilitate a more comprehensive
self-understanding.
Volume 2, Number 3, Fall 1995
Human-Centered or Ecocentric Environmental
Ethics?
John Howie
Abstract: Are ethical principles that guide human
behavior suitable for the array of complex new environmental
problems? Justice, nonmaleficence, noninterference, and fidelity
seem by extension to apply. Conflicts between the principles of
humanistic ethics and environmental ethics may perhaps be
resolved, as Paul W. Taylor indicates, through the application
of such "priority principles" as "self-defense,"
"proportionality," "minimum wrong," and "restitutive justice."
Taylor suggests that these principles would forbid moral agents
from perpetrating harm through direct killing, habitat
destruction, environmental contamination, and pollution.
On The Alleged Uniqueness And
Incomprehensibility Of The Holocaust.
B. William Owen
Abstract: A number of philosophers have argued that the
Holocaust is incapable of philosophical analysis and
explanation. There are two arguments for this view: (1) that it
is unique, and thus resists such analysis; and (2) that it is
incomprehensible, and thus incapable of being understood. In
this article, several versions of both of these arguments are
considered and shown not to support the conclusion that the
Holocaust resists philosophical explanation. An alternative
route to philosophical explanation is then suggested.
The Kevorkian Challenge
Anthony Picchioni, Mary Ann Barnhart, &
Joe Barnhart
Abstract: The problem of self-determination in the dying
process confronts a dilemma regarding clients' desire to know
and not to know. Ambivalence and guilt make "free choice"
problematic in choosing the way to die. Telling dying clients
the "whole truth" about their condition is an art or skill. The
question of a meaningful death raises questions that
philosophical analysis can help clarify.
Galileo and the Church: An Untidy Affair
Edward L. Schoen
Abstract: In his recent review of the Galileo affair,
Pope John Paul II confidently proclaimed the intellectual
autonomy of religion, comfortably affirming that the methods and
ideas of religion are cleanly separable from those of the
sciences. Unfortunately, a close review of the actual details of
the Galilean controversy reveals that the lesson to be learned
from that famous case is not one of sanitary intellectual
compartmentalization, but one of entangling interdependencies
among scientific, religious, and philosophical thought.
Volume 2, Number 4, Winter 1995
Between Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism
Noel E. Boulting
Abstract: Three ways of relating
the structures of human existence to the world are offered by
ecological holism, moral extensionism, and biotic
communitarianism. Leopold's attempt to reconcile these three is
examined in the light of Peirce's categories, in order to
ascertain how far Leopold's final position is anthropocentric,
ecocentric, neither, or both.
Earthday 25: A Retrospective of Reform
Environmental Movements.
Bill Devall
Abstract: Industrial growth and environmental protection
have been in perpetual conflict. Reform environmental movements
have attempted to address some of the worst abuses of nature by
demanding government intervention to restrain pollution. Also,
these reform movements have cooperated with corporate elites to
obtain some controls on pollution. The 104th Congress attempted
to destroy even weak pollution controls. New efforts to mobilize
resistance are occurring. The deep, long-range ecology movement
inspires resistance by affirming the joy of human participation
in nature.
The Self Well Lost: Psychotherapeutic
Interpretation and Nelson Goodman's Irrealism.
Peter J. Mehl
Abstract: In this paper, I consider Goodman's philosophy
in relation to psychotherapeutic interpretation. Goodman argues
that we should understand our knowledge as a creative symbolic
construction, and not as a set of ideas that match reality. The
notion of "the world" does no epistemological work. Using an
example of psychotherapeutic interpretation found in Erick
Erickson's writings, I argue that while Erikson suggests that he
discovers in the patient's showings and tellings the patient's
message and its meaning, I argue (with Goodman) that Erikson
creates a narrative identity for his patient. The self is not
found but fashioned, and it is deemed the true self because it
coheres with Erikson's general theoretic standpoint and is found
to be cognitively and practically helpful for the patient. The
conclusion is that selves, like worlds, are largely creative
constructs.
Volume 3, Number 1, Spring 1996
A Feminist Interpretation of Vulnerability
Nancy J. Annaromao
Abstract: Under patriarchy, the rationally autonomous
agent engages in contractual relations in a marketplace society.
The contractual model reinforces a negative conception of the
vulnerable as weak and as susceptible to injury and
exploitation. Recent feminist writing has a positive notion of
vulnerability that is in conflict with contractualism. Positive
notions of vulnerability, the paper argues, are found in
Virginia Held's conception of mothering, Nel Noddings' analysis
of teaching, and Annette Baier's development of trust as
essential for social relationships.
The Teaching of Ethics
Mark J. Doorley
Abstract: The most important philosophy course that
contemporary undergraduates may take is ethics. Concerned with
how to live a human life, ethics becomes ever more urgent as
life unfolds. As the teacher, a philosopher likely wonders about
the interaction in the classroom. This paper explores that
interaction. Taking a cue from Aristotle, it is argued that the
teaching of ethics is an invitation to self-reflection and
self-responsibility, more so than a passing on of a set of
ethical principles or laws.
Epistemology of Technology Assessment:
Collingridge, Forecasting Methodologies, and Technological
Control.
Cassandra L. Pinnick
Abstract: This paper criticizes Collingridge's arguments
against an epistemology of technological control. Collingridge
claims that because prediction mechanisms are inadequate, his
"dilemma of control" demonstrates that the sociopolitical impact
of new technologies cannot be forecasted, and that,
consequently, policy makers must concentrate their control
measures on minimizing the costs required to alter entrenched
technologies. I argue that Collingridge does not show on either
horn that forecasting is impossible, and that his criticisms of
forecasting methods are self-defeating for they undercut his
positive case for the control of entrenched technologies.
Finally, I indicate an empirical base for forecasting risk that
may define epistemic principles of technology assessment.
Sexual Activity, Consent, Mistaken Belief,
and Mens Rea.
Peg Tittle
Abstract: The gendered subcultures of our society may
have different value systems. Consequently, sexual activity that
involves members of these subcultures may be problematic,
especially concerning the encoding and decoding of consent. This
has serious consequences for labelling the activity as sex or
sexual assault. Conceiving consent not as a mental act but as a
behavioural act (that is, using a performative standard) would
eliminate these problems. However, if we remove the mental
element from one aspect, then to be consistent we must remove it
from all; and, as a result, the "mistaken belief" defense would
be eliminated and mens rea would become insignificant (in
other words, if what the woman means is irrelevant, then
what the man believes or intends should also be
irrelevant). This consequence suggests major changes to our
current conceptions of legal justice, which changes, if
undesirable, prompt reconsideration of the initial proposal to
use a performative standard for consent.
Volume 3, Number 2, Summer 1996
Is Naturalized Epistemology Experientially
Vacuous?
Michael G. Barnhart
Abstract: By naturalized epistemology, I mean those views
expressed by Nozick and Margolis among others who favor an
evolutionary account of human rationality as an adaptive
mechanism which is unlikely to provide the means of its own
legitimization and therefore unlikely to produce a single set of
rules or norms which are certifiably rational. Analyzing the
likely relativism that stems from such a view, namely that there
could be divergent standards of rationality under different
historical or environmental conditions, I conclude that
evolutionary epistemologies are unable to account for
rationality as an experienced capacity on the part of human
beings. After giving a few examples of what seem to me to be
cases where we do experience a form of reason that appears
antinomian, I challenge a naturalized view of mind to embrace
and provide some sort of explanatory account of this kind of
mental elasticity that it both seems to make room for and is
certainly not unfamiliar to other philosophical perspectives
such as that of Zen Buddhism.
Rethinking Wilderness: The Need for a New
Idea of Wilderness.
Michael P. Nelson
Abstract: The "received" concept of wilderness as a place
apart from and untouched by humans is five-times flawed: it is
not universalizable, it is ethnocentric, it is ecologically
naive, it separates humans from nature, and its referent is
nonexistent. The received view of wilderness leads to dilemmas
and unpalatable consequences, including the loss of designated
wilderness areas by political and legislative authorities. What
is needed is a more flexible notion of wilderness. Suggestions
are made for a revised concept of wilderness.
Toward a Feminist Revision of Research
Protocols on the Etiology of Homosexuality.
Stephanie S. Turner
Abstract: Examining the language and paradigms of science
as rhetorical, that is, arising from the sociocultural forces
that shape ideology, reveals androcentric assumptions that tend
to thwart democratic public policy as well as effective
methodology. This paper applies some recent feminist critiques
of the biological sciences to the current research on the
possible hormonal and genetic factors contributing to
homosexuality, clarifying how this research perpetuates
hierarchical binaries and suggesting ways to reconceptualize
human sexuality through revised research protocols.
Incommensurable Differences: Cultural
Relativism and Anti-rationalism Concerning Self and Other.
Joseph Wagner
Abstract: This paper is a defense of rationalism and a
critique of what I call anti-rationalist themes in
postmodernist, feminist and multiculturalist thought. I use the
term rationalism in its broad sense to identify an extensive set
of philosophic assumptions rooted in the Enlightenment.
Rationalism in this sense encompasses the empiricist,
materialist and Kantian positions out of which modern analytic
philosophy develops. In particular, this paper focuses on
criticisms that treat rationality and attendant presumptions of
objectivity as a Eurocentric form of ethnocentrism. These
anti-rationalist concerns are often expressed in prescriptions
for multiculturalism and complaints about Western
logocentrism and insensitivity to the importance of
difference, diversity, attunement, and other. The
paper identifies central themes that reflect this anti-modern
and anti-rationalist temper and argues that each embodies a deep
irresolvable philosophic confusion. In developing this critique,
I try to show that the Enlightenment project, properly
understood, provides the best and most comprehensive groundings
for declaiming and remedying the faults of ethnocentrism and
prejudice.
Volume 3, Number 3, Fall 1996
Born to Affirm the Eternal Recurrence:
Nietzsche, Buber, and Springsteen.
Jonathan R. Cohen
Abstract: I argue that the Bruce Springsteen song "Born
to Run" needs to be interpreted in light of--and thus gives
evidence of a connection between--the philosophies of Friedrich
Nietzsche and Martin Buber. Along the way I give an in-depth
reading of the Nietzschean doctrines of Eternal Recurrence and
Overman as they emerge from Also Sprach Zarathustra, as
well as a brief overview of Buber's I and Thou.
Ethics and MIS Education
Matthew K. McGowan & Richard J. McGowan
Abstract: In this paper, we document the need for an
education in ethics in management information systems (MIS)
curricula, identify the gap in current curricula materials for
MIS, and propose material and an organization of material to
include in MIS curricula. The paper contributes to the
development of material on ethics for MIS curricula, and also
advances the discussion between people educated in MIS and
people educated in ethics.
Fragmented Selves and Loss of Community
Erin McKenna & J. Craig Hanks
Abstract: In this paper we try to provide the beginning
of an analysis of some of the crises of our time. We do so by
arguing that a certain account of the individual blocks our
ability to think about solutions at the individual and the
social levels. As an example we take the industrialization of
housework in the United States and its effects on women's
identity and on notions of "home." We suggest that the rise of
liberal individualism, the industrialization of public and
private life, and the predomination of capitalism are central to
the disintegration of the individual/self, and that they limit
the possibilities of some to determine the content and direction
of self change. We argue that a notion of self as integrated and
in process is needed in order to address our rapidly changing
world.
The Theory of Meaning: An Impasse
Abdur Razzaque
Abstract: This paper endeavors to delineate the salient
features of the theory of meaning and to show how meaning
converges with metaphysics. For the British classical linguistic
philosophers, meaning concerns only autonomous propositions,
which allegedly in isolation clarify thought and facilitate
understanding of language. But for the American philosophers W.
V. O. Quine and Donald Davidson, meaning is inextricably related
to human life and its problems. According to them, our
experiences are interrelated and cannot be separated from one
another. A statement cannot be meaningful in isolation; that is
to say, it cannot have meaning without holistic connections and
metaphysical presumptions.
Volume 3, Number 4, Winter 1996
The Supreme God in African (Igbo)
Religious Thought.
Egbeke Aja
Abstract: From African ontology, religious experiences,
myths of creation, and language, I argue that even though
Africans (Igbo) conceive of supreme deities, none of the
adjudged supreme deities is identifiable with the Supreme God
propagated by Christian missionaries and theologians. To
translate, therefore, the names of African deities, such as
Chukwu or Chineke, to mean the God preached by
Christians is to yoke to the Igbo religious thought the concept
"creation out of nothing," which is alien to traditional African
cosmology. Such a translation will not only distort the
architecture of traditional African religion, it will impose on
the Igbo the recognition of a deity that would be beyond the
reach of their standard reciprocity arrangements with their
Gods. Moreover, throughout Igboland, no shrines are dedicated to
the worship of an unknown God identifiable with that propagated
by Christians.
I Married an Empiricist: A Phenomenologist
Examines Philosophical Personae.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract: I suggest that philosophical writers should
connect epistemological theorizing with life experience in order
to explore the complex relationship between the two. The
relationship of theory to experience does not fit the neat
hierarchical model of a small number of general organizing
principles giving form to or receiving form from a large mass of
facts. Instead, as the narrative of my honeymoon and my life
following it suggests, philosophical theories are one of the
many genres of stories philosophers tell themselves in the
process of creating and recreating personal identities and
personae.
Liberalism and Consumerism
Roger Paden
Abstract: Communitarians have argued that liberalism
somehow causes or leads to a consumer society. Moreover, they
have argued that consumer society is somehow morally suspect.
Given the connection between liberalism and consumerism, they
have argued that the moral problems they have found in consumer
society give reason to oppose liberalism. In this paper, after
defining "consumerism" and "liberalism," I examine the various
communitarian arguments against consumerism, and the various
arguments that seek to connect liberalism to consumerism. I
argue that only one of these arguments has any hope of
establishing this connection.
Re-claiming Hestia: Goddess of Everyday
Life.
Patricia J. Thompson
Abstract: The concepts of "hearth and home" and "keeping
the home fire burning" can be traced back to ancient Greece and
are associated with the oikos. Such metaphors remain
pervasive (if often disregarded) expressions in contemporary
life. The goddess Hestia, identified as the "goddess of the
hearth," has been maligned in the patriarchal literature and
ignored in feminist writing. This paper argues for re-visiting
and re-claiming Hestia as a unifying principle in meeting the
quotidian demands of everyday life. It suggests a new
perspective for further philosophical exploration of the
"private sphere" with special relevance for practical reasoning
in the ethics and aesthetics involved in contemporary life.
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2, Spring & Summer
1997
An Incrementalist View of Proposed Uses of
Information Technology in Higher Education.
Marvin J. Croy
Abstract: A number of national educational organizations
and individual authors have called for the use of information
technology to radically reform higher education. Several
projections of how this reformation will unfold are presented
here. Three different approaches to critically assessing these
projections are considered in this article, two briefly and one
in more detail. Brief consideration is given to an approach
based on educational values and to an approach based on
cost/benefit analysis. After some discussion of the strengths
and weaknesses of these approaches, a third approach deriving
from a theory of technology control (incrementalism) is
elaborated in more detail and is found to offer helpful
criticisms of the called for revolution in higher education.
Some recommendations for how these new technologies can be
developed in responsible ways are also offered.
Authority, Autonomy, Authenticity: An
Etiological Understanding.
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract: This essay attempts to understand the search
for authenticity in terms of the breakdown of authority in the
modern world. The sense of autonomy, I argue, emerges from the
need to choose the authorities one will accept. The
ever-increasing difficulty of choosing from among authorities is
internalized and is experienced as a difficulty of choosing, or
"finding," oneself. The shattered authorities on the outside
become a fragmented self on the inside. The search for the
authentic self, then, is the search for an authority on the
inside that has been broken and lost on the outside. The
prospects for achieving such selfhood are critically evaluated.
On Cyberspace and Being: Identity, Self,
and Hyperreality.
Lucas D. Introna
Abstract: Does it make sense to talk about cyberspace as
an alternative social reality? Is cyberspace the new frontier
for the realization of the postmodern self? For philosophers
Taylor and Saarinen, and the psychologist Turkle, cyberspace is
the practical manifestation of a postmodern reality, or rather
hyperreality (Baudrillard). In hyperreal cyberspace, they argue,
identity becomes plastic, "I can change my self as easily as I
change my clothes." I will argue using Martin Heidegger that our
being is being-in-the-world. To be-in-the-world means to be
involved in the world; to have an involvement whole that is the
always already present significance of what I do. Furthermore,
that the making or choosing of self is only existentially
meaningful in a horizon of significance, and involvement whole.
I will argue that identity is tied to community, and community
involves accepting some level of already there thrownness. Every
cyber-traveler will eventually have to deal with the fact of
being, always already, in-the-world.
Matters of Meaning: Authenticity,
Autonomy, and Authority in Kierkegaard.
Peter J. Mehl
Abstract: I argue that at least some of Kierkegaard's
authorship is designed to make a rational case for a religious
and specifically Christian existence; he is not a total fideist.
He argues that anything short of the existential stance of the
"strong spiritual/moral evaluator" is despair. To overcome this
we are compelled to reach for religious or transcendent sources
of meaning; the authentic life is the life of constant ethical
and spiritual evaluation grounded in the authority of God. But I
ask how does Kierkegaard justify the stance of the strong
evaluator in the first place? I argue that he crafts an
existential and pragmatic case for it, but that this approach
does not have the strength he suggests. Indeed, I argue that
because this defense reflects his own Protestant Christian
context, his case for Christian existence (as an existence of
strong spiritual/moral evaluation) is seriously weakened.
Consumerism, the Procedural Republic, and
the Unencumbered Self.
Roger Paden
Abstract: Communitarians have offered a number of
arguments against liberalism that connect liberalism to
consumerism. In this paper, I examine an argument to this effect
developed by Michael Sandel. I argue that Sandel's argument
fails to undermine liberalism, but that it does demonstrate that
many contemporary liberals have placed too great an emphasis on
the principle of political neutrality. I argue that liberalism,
properly understood, requires both limited neutrality and
an emphasis on democratic deliberation. If this is the case,
than Sandel's argument misses its target. However, it does point
out how contemporary liberalism needs to be reformed. By
emphasizing more local democratic control over the economy,
liberalism would not only become more theoretically consistent,
but it would distance itself from consumerism.
One Oppression Or Many?
Lani Roberts
Abstract: Enquiry into the relationship between kinds of
oppression raises several possibilities. Perhaps there are
multiple yet distinct oppressions. If this is so, are there
philosophical relationships among them? What are the theoretical
distinctions between racism and sexism, for example. The
question raised here has to do with the philosophical structure
of social dominance, rather than the discrete manifestations
usually based on distinct target groups. Although the
characteristics of peoples who are targets of each of the
individual kinds of oppression are different, and even though
many people are multiply oppressed, there is good reason to
question the underlying assumption that each form of oppression
is fundamentally separate and distinct from the others. There
are many deep correspondences shared by specifically focused
theories of oppression. It is plausible to suggest there is a
single phenomenon called oppression. Perhaps there is only one
monster with several heads, rather than many monsters hiding in
our communal closet.
Language, Meaning, and Ethics: A
Phenomenological Correlation of Morality and Self-Conscious
Signification.
James B. Sauer
Abstract: This paper takes up an underdeveloped argument
of Charles Taylor that linguisticality is constitutive of moral
agency. Taylor's position is part of a set of contemporary
arguments that language, especially as dialogue or discourse, is
the normative framework which grounds or validates fundamental
norms or values. Taylor's contribution to this "dialogical turn"
is substantial and innovative, but it is not without weakness.
Rather than deal with all the issues involved in this dialogical
turn, I argue just that language does ground morality as a
distinctively human way of creating meaning, that is, as Taylor
argues, constitutive of the self and self-understanding.
Self-understanding, or the appropriation of moral
self-consciousness, is what is meant by the authenticity and
autonomy which constitute moral authority. I argue in essence
that language provides a necessary and constitutive link between
private and public spheres of meaning in a way that renders
moral discourse meaningful and constitutively human.
Against Cartmill on Hunting: Kinship with
Animals and the Midcentric Fallacy.
Forrest Wood, Jr.
Abstract: Three recent books offer alternative views of
hunting: Matt Cartmill's A View to A Death in the
Morning (Cartmill, 1993), James Swan's In Defense of
Hunting (Swan 1995), and Forrest Wood's The Delights and
Dilemmas of Hunting (Wood,1997). First, I argue that
Cartmill's claim of continuity of kind between animals and
persons is both overstated and logically disconnected from the
hunting/anti-hunting debate. Second, I argue that Cartmill's
claim that the suffering of sentient animals is somehow
intrinsically undesirable exhibits an unjustified prejudice
toward middle-sized organisms.
Volume 4, Number 3, Fall 1997
Wallace Stevens: A Portrait of the Artist
as a Phenomenologist.
James A. Clark
Abstract: Confusing modern poetry with philosophy is a
common fault of literary criticism. Yet, the work of some poets
can benefit critically from philosophical interpretations.
Wallace Stevens is a poet who manifested an abiding interest in
philosophy. His poems consistently display, in both their syntax
and modulation of thought, philosophical parallels. Stevens'
dominant mode of thought is phenomenological. This can be shown
by analyzing parallels between phenomenological methodology and
Stevens' poetry. Particularly three poems--"Thirteen Ways of
Looking at a Blackbird" (1917), "The Snow Man" (1921), and "The
Latest Freed Man" (1938)--embody, respectively, the poem as
doing phenomenology, the poem as a description of
the phenomenological mind, and the poem as a portrait of the
phenomenologist.
Impartialism, Care, and the Self.
M. Carmela Epright
Abstract: In this paper, I discuss the ethics of care as
a response to impartialist ethical theories. In section 1, I
contrast Gilligan's critique of impartial ethical theories with
other objections to impartialism. In section 2, I analyze some
of the ways in which impartialists have attempted to understand
the ethics of care since the publication of Gilligan's text. In
section 3, I argue against proponents of impartialism and show
that care constitutes an ethical theory in its own right, not
one which is dependent or parasitic upon impartialism. In
section 4, I contrast care ethic's conception of the self with
that offered by traditional ethical theories, and argue that the
most important distinction between the care and impartialist
accounts of morality lies in the conception of the moral self
which informs each of these approaches.
Ontological Assumptions: Descartes,
Searle, and Edelman.
Gregg E. Franzwa
Abstract: The proposition that there is a purely causal
explanation of subjective states of human consciousness is a
philosophical one. The affirmation of such a proposition must be
a premise to research. And the justification for such a premise
will be found in part in the fundamental ontological assumptions
of the researcher. By examining the assumptions of Rene
Descartes, at the beginning of the scientific age, I hope to
show a similar set of assumptions behind the thought of two
recent contributors to the debate, John Searle and Gerald
Edelman. I will conclude that a crucial question begged by all
three.
The View From Nowhere and the Meaning of
Life in Thomas Nagel.
Larry D. Harwood
Abstract: Thomas Nagel contends that the actual
philosophical problem in the meaning of life is the independent
world we live in, and only requires a self-transcendent being
who glimpses and independent world. I argue that Nagel is
mistaken to think that self-transcendence evokes the same
anxiety for humans living in the world of Dante as Darwin.
Nagel's view from nowhere is rather a modern version of the
world. Secondly, while I concede that there is a common anxiety
felt by self-transcendence in glimpsing an independent objective
world, we also view that world through a set of beliefs that
conditions how we see that world.
The Duty of Solidarity: Feminism and
Catholic Social Teaching.
Sally J. Scholz
Abstract: Catholic Social Teaching of late has a lot more
in common with feminist moral theory than might be evident at
first glance, After a brief explanation of Catholic Social
Teaching's duty of solidarity, and a look at some of the
feminist critiques of this solidarity, I point out some of the
significant similarities between feminist ethics and the duty of
solidarity. The last section focuses on community and care, the
epistemological role of experience and the world view of the
other, the centrality of self-determination, and the final goal
of both the duty of solidarity and feminist ethics: liberation
from oppression.
Community of Choice and Community of
Origin: Insights into Dewey's Theory of Communication.
Roger Ward
Abstract: This essay unearths the meaning of community in
John Dewey's Experience andNature, using Marilyn
Friedman's terms "community of choice" and "community of
origin." The authority of communication as determinative of
Dewey's community comes out. In fact, communication seems to be
the philosophical point of Dewey's descriptions in that book,
which reveals his anticipation of a community wherever
communication obtains. Dewey is shown, in conclusion. to call us
beyond communities of choice or origin to a community of
authority which holds both peculiar promise for, and demands of,
individuals.
Volume 4, Number 4, Winter 1998
APA Central Division Group Session G1-3, May 7, 1998, Chicago,
Illinois:
Richard Cohen on Levinas and Rosenzweig.
Engaging Transcendence: Can We Think G-d
and Philosophy Together?
James B. Sauer
No Abstract
It's (Almost) All Greek To Me: Levinas's
"Ethics As First Philosophy" and Analytic Philosophy.
Stiv Fleishman
No Abstract
Responses to Sauer and Fleishman
Richard A. Cohen
No Abstract
Community and Alterity: A Gadamerian
Approach.
Donald M. Maier
Abstract: In this paper, I ask how we, as linguistically
constituted subjects, form communities that respect difference.
Whatever "commonality" we find in our multicultural society
cannot be grounded in a narrow concept of reason, a singular
method of inquiry, or an a priori logic, but in language. By
examining Hans-Georg Gadamer's concept of linguisticality, we
see that there can be a universal ground of meaning that will
foster the formation of communities without recourse to the
traditional foundations of thinking. Gadamer contends that
language presents philosophy an infinite task that urges us to
consider our fundamental linguisticality, the linguistic
experience from which languages develop. By examining
Augustine's notion of the "innerword", Gadamer explains our
capacity to understand others, even when understanding seems
least likely. Gadamer's hermeneutics encourages us to understand
the Other's language. I conclude that a Gadamerian community
allows us to understand each other without requiring that the
Other become like us.
Multinational Ethics At Work in Nigeria
Eddy Souffrant
Abstract: Cases of intervention in international affairs
are often thought justifiable if the intervention is exercised
against rogue political leaders and delinquent nation-states.
The author offers an argument for the inclusion of an
increasingly ubiquitous international agent, the profit
generating corporation. This done, the paper argues that a
cosmopolitan ethics of responsibility is an attractive mode of
evaluation that renders corporations accountable in the
international environment. This ethics of responsibility is
applied to the particular case of British/Dutch Shell, Inc., in
Nigeria to argue the merits of international intervention.
Reclaiming Hermes: Guardian of the Public
Sphere.
Patricia J. Thompson
Abstract: In an earlier paper, Hestia (R.
Vesta)--guardian of the family hearthfire and center of
household/family ritual activities in the ancient Greek oikos--was
re-claimed as a metaphor for philosophical analysis of the
private sphere in everyday life (SPCW, 1996). This paper
undertakes a comparable project of reclamation for Hermes (R.
Mercury), guardian of the public sphere of the ancient Greek
polis and its later manifestations. The goal of this project
of reclamation is not to introduce unnecessary neologisms or to
support "New Age" spirituality. It is, rather, to help
philosophers and social theorist to hold in mind two distinctive
systems of human action within a single explanatory paradigm.
Doing so allows us to compare and contrast in a consistent and
coherent manner events, institutions, and actions in each of two
systems operating in everyday life without privileging one
(usually the polis and the political ) over the other
(the oikos and the familial). It is hoped that doing so
may promote a dual standpoint theory that can take contemporary
feminist theory (which seems to have painted itself into a
corner) beyond gender.
Volume 5, Number 1, Spring 1998
Hegel's Impact on Russian Constitutional
Development
Alexander S. Fesenko
Abstract: This essay argues that the thinker whose
teaching played a key role in the formation of the Rusian
political and legal paradigm was no Marx but Hegel. It analyzes
the impact of the Hegelian philosophy on the development of the
Russian constitutional tradition and examines its political
implications.
The Irony of Political Philosophy
Andrew Fiala
Abstract: Political philosophy is a paradoxical attempt
to bring reason to bear upon a subject matter that is
irrational. This problem has been side-stepped by many
contemporary political thinkers. Political theorists like Iris
Young, Michael Sandel, Jean Elshtain, Robert Bork, and Richard
Peterson acknowledge that contemporary political life, with its
lack of democratic participation and its undemocratic
bureaucratic institutions and is undergoing a legitimization
crisis. This approach forgets, however, that there can be no
rational resolutions within the political realm. Political
philosophy alone cannot resolve the legitimization crisis. This
is especially so because the contemporary legitimization crisis
arises, in part, from a lack of rationality on the part of both
agents and institutions. Yet, we cannot fully give up on the
enterprise of political philosophy. To do so would be to
acquiesce to irrationality and the lack of legitimization found
in contemporary political life. This paper argues that political
philosophers, ay their best, must adopt a deliberately ironic
disposition; while demanding rational analyses of political
life, they must acknowledge that rational analysis may itself be
ineffectual in political life.
Encountering the Face of God: A Levinasian
Exploration of Theistic Existentialism
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract: This essay explores the
intersection of the ideas of Emmanuel Levinas and theistic
existentialism by exploring the metaphor of being confronted by
the blank face of God in times of great stress. Levinas
criticizes the history of metaphysics for focusing exclusively
on the analysis of objects. He aims to redirect philosophy
toward the study of relationships, and focuses on the experience
eof being confronted by another human face. Jean-Paul Sartre's
proof of the nonexistence of God illustrates Levinas' critique.
Sartre treats God as an object with determinate properties, and
concludes that all who believe in Gid are seeking a false sense
of security. Many theistic existentialist, however, speak of God
as a partner in relationship, rather than as a thing, and do not
expect to be freed from uncertainty or responsibility through a
relationship with God.
Philosophy as Argument/Philosophy as
Conversation
Edward G. Lawry
Abstract: This paper criticizes the understanding of
philosophy as entirely made up of argument. It gives some
characterization of argument as a rhetorical form and
conversation as a motivating attitude. It explicates the
understanding of this distinction in Book 1 of Plato's
Republic, and emphasizes the contemporary relevance of the
distinction by appeal to the work of Richard Rorty. While
respectful of Rorty's insights, it sides more with the Platonic
understanding of philosophical conversation, which does not
abandon the pursuit of truth.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency
Richard Schoeing
Abstract: I describe three major areas in which I argue
that Christians' belief that abortion is morally wrong is
inconsistent with other important abortion-related mainstream
Christian beliefs or actions based on those beliefs. The three
areas are: (1) abortion and soul-saving; (2) abortion prevention
and violence; and (3) abortion and the fate of frozen fertilized
human eggs. I make no direct argument about the moral status of
abortion itself.
Between Dogmatism and Relativism: André
Comte-Sponville's Cynicism
Sébastien Charles
Abstract: This essay introduces the work of André
Comte-Sponville to an English audience by explaining his ethical
position. Comte-Sponville calls this position "cynicism," and
intends it as a corrective of the excesses of both relativism
and dogmatism. The distinction critical for understanding
cynicism is that between value and truth, which are here used to
explain all three: cynicism, dogmatism, and relativism.
Volume 5, Numbers 2-3, Summer-Fall 1998
That is the Happiest Conversation...
James B. Sauer
No Abstract
A Modest Realism
Joe Frank Jones, III
Abstract: This essay argues that essentialism and
epistemological foundationalism can be separated, and that a
"humble" realism-foundationalism can be described which explains
common cultural practices like counseling. A necessary
constructionist component survives in this still legitimately
'realist' position, but it is shown not to lead to any crippling
skepticism or relativism, as does pure constructionism.
In Support of a Modest Realism:
Applications to Narratives of Self and Philosophical
Methodology.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract: The "modest realism" described by Joe Frank
Jones, III offers a sound methodological model for developing
both self-understanding and philosophical theories. Claire
Chafee's play Why We Have a Body illustrates the pitfalls
of living both a thoroughgoing realism and a thoroughgoing
idealism and argues for the conception of a life story as a
project in which discovery and invention play side by side.
Stanley Cavell argues that the shape of a philosophy mirrors the
shape of a philosopher's life. Thereby he suggests that Ludwig
Wittgenstein saw his own revolutionary philosophical work as a
species of modest realism, i.e., continuing to turn in fruitful
directions, rather than as a species of anti-idealism, i.e.,
rejecting an entire tradition of philosophical theorizing.
A Modest Constructionism: Response to Joe
Frank Jones, III.
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract: In this response I argue (a) that Jones'
minimalist realism is, also, a minimalist constructionism. And
(b) that the silent sphere of evidence that Jones' uses to
ground his realism, may not be able to supply even a minimalist,
strictly negative ground for epistemic endeavors.
Dissociation: An Evolutionary
Interpretation
Joe Barnhart, Ph.D.
Abstract: My hypothesis is that human personhood has
ancient biological roots which make it possible for social
reinforcers to contribute to the gradual construction of real
persons who are always deeper than the stories about them.
Multiple persons do sometimes emerge from one human organism.
Rather than try to prove they are real, I explore the
consequences of assuming them to be genuine emergents that
become social environment to one another. I suggest that the
multiple-persons phenomenon has profoundly influenced the
development of human ethics and the attainment of personhood
through the pursuit of ideals.
Toward a Hermeneutics of Memory and
Multiple Personality.
Randall R. Lyle
Abstract: Barnhardt, in "Dissociation: An Evolutionary
Interpretation," makes a case for understanding multiple
personality as a "natural" phenomenon resulting from human
biological evolution. He also argues that the reason that
"multiple personalities" are not encountered more frequently is
a result of a social construction encouraging "single"
personalities. He concludes that it is from the interaction
between the two that ethics derive. In this response I offer an
alternative hermeneutic, using memory as the interpretive key,
and by introducing Ricoeur's work on narrative, highlight how
Barnhardt's argument limits us to a "scientific" understanding
of Multiple Personality and thus limits our ability to
understand and enact a viable "ethic" of care.
Insight, Judgment, World: Rethinking the
Ontology of Being and Time.
Jerome A. Miller
Abstract: Revisiting Heidegger's interpretation of
"world" in Being and Time can help us come to grips with
the conflict between the naturalistic and hermeneutical points
of view which post-modernism has aggravated rather than
resolved. After discussing Heidegger's account of the
"hermeneutical circle," and his rejection of the correspondence
theory of truth, I argue that , to "save" truth form
hermeneutical relativism, Heidegger smuggles naturalism inside
the hermeneutical circle. I suggest that, in order to abandon
naturalism without abandoning truth, it is necessary to
radically rethink the nature of judgment and recognize that it
alone completes our ontological access to the world.
Changing the Metaphors of Foundation
Kenneth L. Buckman
Abstract: The traditional philosophical metaphors of
epistemology, which speak of grounds or foundation, produce a
conception of knowledge as fixed and absolute. This paper is not
an effort to revive traditional epistemological view of
foundations and origins. After a preliminary and cursory
discussion of how the metaphors of foundation and ground are
employed, principally by Descartes and Heidegger, and what is
suggested by such an employment, I sketch the postmodern
rejection of these metaphors. However, I further indicate how,
as valuable as it is, postmodern criticism leaves us with an
inadequate account of how we understand ourselves and how it is
that we understand in general. I criticize postmodern thinking
for ignoring the human elements of feeling and imagination and
endorse the more satisfying model suggested by Paul Ricoeur. By
understanding the role of feeling and imagination, we can escape
the strict sterility of the grapheme. I end with my own
suggestion that we gain a better sense of our attachment to and
understanding of the world if we change the metaphors of
foundations, grounds, and origins and instead employ metaphors
of gathering, coalescence, or coagulation.
Thinking Problematically: Scribbling in
the Margins.
K. E. Jensen
Abstract: This essay provides a pastpostmodern
phenomenological account of a good idea. It is a short
experiment in what Foucault calls, "the unchanging pedagogical
origins of dialectics." The 'ostensible' question considered is:
What follows in the wake of nihilism? Scribbling in the margins,
a metaphor for the classical task of the public intellectual, is
one way of nudging the reader into the periphery of writing.
The Embodied and Transcendental Self:
Toward A Synthesis and A Way of Knowing.
Ralph D. Ellis
Abstract: The 'embodied self' is the purposeful dimension
of any organism capable of acting toward a unified motivation to
maintain a self-organizing structure by appropriating,
replacing, and reproducing material components to serve as
substrata. We reflect on the 'self ' in this sense when we
direct attention away from the objects of experience and toward
the way our bodies motivate our experiences in terms of
emotional purposes of the organism, by looking, searching,
shifting the focus of attention, etc.--actions rather than
reactions of our bodies and nervous systems. The 'transcendental
self,' by contrast, cannot be identified with any particular
embodied state of consciousness, because it is that which
unifies all the particular stages and gives them direction. It
is argued here that affect and motivation are the keys to
understanding and unifying the transcendental and embodied
selves, because both reflect the organism's self-organizing
tendency; and that we can know ourselves by understanding the
way affect and motivation shape the pattern and direction of our
stream of consciousness.
The Self in Aristotle's Ethics
Stephen A Calogero
Abstract: This paper examines Aristotle's treatment of
friendship and self-love in Books VIII and IX of the
Nicomachean Ethics. The purpose is to explore what Aristotle
means by self, and his understanding of why selves become
engaged in benevolent relationships with others. Some discussion
of Aristotle's influence on Kierkegaard helps to bring out the
significance of Aristotle's insights about the self. Aristotle
explains how the self's movement toward actuality grounds
friendship and benevolence. True friendship and all endeavors to
"produce" good, derive from love for one's own being as mediated
by one's intelligence or nous. All such authentic endeavors
constitute an effort to actualize one's self, to act nobly, to
in one's achievement and to participate in the community of
being.
Volume 5, Number 4, Winter 1998
A General Framework for Philosophical
Counseling.
Hakam Al-Shawi
Abstract: This paper presents a general framework for
philosophical counseling founded upon the distinction between
philosophical discourse and philosophy as a live experience.
Clients enter counseling, usually, philosophically
unsophisticated, but with a set of perspectives and a
predicament. I outline the two general processes of
philosophical counseling that address such a reported
predicament. The first process-critique-involves a critical
examination of the client's philosophical perspectives, as they
are related to the reported predicament. Through the use of the
Socratic method, the counselor attempts to examine the relation,
meaning, implications, etc., of such perspectives. This, I
argue, leads to a destabilization of the client, where
previously unquestioned beliefs and values become doubtful. As
such, a second process-creation-is needed in order to overcome
the destabilization of the initial process. For this process to
succeed, I argue, philosophical counseling must avoid the
problem of suggestion by not relying on any first-order
philosophical assumptions.
Sartre's Existential Consciousness:
Implications for Intersubjectivity.
Noel Boulting
Abstract: Sartre's Degrees of Consciousness Theory is
developed in order to ascertain what this existential conception
implies for an account of human intersubjectivity. Once active
involvement in instrumental concerns-first degree
consciousness-and reflection, whether of an impure kind
characterizing second degree consciousness or a pure
consciousness-that of a third degree-are distinguished,
attention is focused upon the kinds of social relations
typifying each kind of consciousness. A model for social
relations is suggested to distinguish it from either the
conflict model, with which it is often confused, or the
'we-subject' model necessary for world exploitation so as to
offer a way of grounding a morality as promised at the end of
Being and Nothingness.
Unity and Undecidability: The Subject of
Kant's First Critique
Stuart Dalton
Abstract: This essay argues that, in the first Critique,
the need for unity leads Kant to re-inscribe the subject in a
situation of multiplicity and undecidability. The result,
however,. is not a relativization that negates the meaning of
the subject's existence, but rather a contextualization that
makes meaning possible. This reading clarifies some of the
connections between Kant and contemporary postmodernism,
especially the work of Jacques Derrida.
What Philosophical Counseling Can't Do.
Lou Marinoff
Abstract: Notwithstanding recent successes of
philosophical counseling, which appear to be leading to its
legitimization as a professional practice in America and abroad,
many forces concert to condition its emergent structure and
function. This paper briefly elucidates some of the influences
to which philosophical counseling is subject, that lie beyond
its unilateral control. These include its portrayal by the media
to the public, its scope of practice, its relations with
psychology and psychiatry, its foreseeable effects in particular
cases, and its perception by (and of) analytical philosophy.
Why Has God Forsaken Me? Philosophically
Counseling a Crisis of Faith.
Peter B. Raabe
Abstract: This essay traces a case in which I was
involved. It illustrates that counselors and clients can have
very different worldviews, down to and including different views
concerning the existence of God, and yet philosophy can do its
work in the counseling setting. It also illustrates that
straight thinking can be very valuable to both religious and
irreligious persons.
How Many Spaces Does it Take to Get to the
Center of a Theory of Human Problem Solving?
David F. Wolf II
Abstract: The diverse number of N-space theories and the
unrestrained growth of the number of spaces within the multiple
space models has incurred general skepticism about the new
search space variants within the search space paradigm of
psychology. I argue that any N-space theory is computationally
equivalent to a single space model. Nevertheless, the N-space
theories may explain the systematic behavior of human problem
solving better than the original one search space theory by
identifying relationships between the tasks that occur in
problem solving. These tasks are independent of the particular
process and may not be explicitly represented by the problem
solver. N-space theorists seem to overlook their own reason for
distinguishing N-space theories from single space models, namely
the presupposition that these tasks must have a unified,
underlying search space architecture. This assumption is
ill-founded and may implement a procedural restraint that could
impede psychological research. |